I am favorably disposed to a soda tax because harmful actions should be discouraged; e.g. over-consumption of sugar.
As Derek Thompson from The Atlantic ,
The added benefit of a sin tax is that by taxing something you consider harmful, you can win in two ways. If you don't discourage consumption of the taxed good, revenues go up. If you do discourage consumption of the taxed good, then congratulations, you've reduced the sin you considered harmful in the first place. Considering on soaring health care costs, that would be a very good thing indeed.
Now, I do not believe it is the government's role to dictate what we eat, how much we eat, and when we eat. I'm a firm believer in personal responsibility for my eating habits. However, I do believe the government has an interest in protecting the health of its citizens by passing regulations or taxes consistent with such goals.
And considering the enormous impact obesity impacts health care costs, it seems reasonable to tax those responsible for incurring such expenses.
I'm certainly curious to hear what others think. Why do you (or do not) support a soda tax?
0 comments: